“We're English, and the
English are best at everything.”
There
are few novels assigned to schoolchildren so despairing and damning
as Lord of the Flies. The
story's central thesis, that there is a “Beast” inside our
collective soul liable to wreck havoc on the Earth and murder
enemies, is a most pessimistic parable to grasp, particularly for the
middle-school reader, aged twelve. The author, William Golding, might
have been serving the spirit of the times, that of a narrative beyond
Auschwitz and Hiroshima, but sixty years on, the story resonates, as
even the holocaust and atomic cataclysms have failed to learn us to
be better persons, loving and respecting one another. This remains a
world where Power corrupts and destroys, whether it be via military,
corporate, or even schoolyard shows of force.
Lord of the Flies
could be a metaphor for any badly governed state. A group of boys are
marooned on a small tropical island paradise. There is the initial
euphoria of independence (there are no grownups and therefore an
absence of traditional authority figures), followed shortly by an
attempt at republican organization, but which quickly collapses into
factionalism, later secession, and finally civil war. From this
random allotment of children, the main archetypes of society emerge.
There is a natural leader, Ralph; an aspiring warrior-autocrat, Jack;
an ineffectual intellectual, Piggy; a sensitive, effeminate, artistic
clairvoyant, Simon; workers and/or hunters,“biguns;” and a
lumpen-proletariat, “the littluns.” With the exception of Ralph,
Piggy, Simon, and the twins, “SamnEric,” all of the biguns are
from a choir group, and follow Jack's lead first in dissension and
later in secession.
Ralph
and Piggy want to be rescued, so their priority is maintaining a
signal fire. Opposed to this longview, Jack and the choir-kids become
“hunters,” obsessed with exploiting the island's most important
(and limited) resource, pigs' meat. In true fascist tradition, they
become obsessed with the pageantry of their lifestyle, abandoning old
clothes for facepaint and dressing as “savages,” unifying
objectives with song (“Kill the pig. Cut his throat...”),
demonstrating heartlessness towards those of limited utility (the
littluns are disposable “crybabies” who “don't hunt or build or
help”) and ruthlessness towards their enemies (the abduction of
Piggy's glasses, the forced conscription of SamnEric, and of course,
cold-blooded murder of ideological nemeses.)
Photo still from the 1963 film adaptation
These
may be children but they are innately aware of the talismanic power
of certain objects. Piggy's glasses, though they define one of his
physical shortcomings, are their only means for starting fire,
without which, there is no smoke signal nor means to cook their
quarry's flesh. Just as important, the conch, a shell of “fragile,
shining beauty,” is the symbol of democracy. Ralph, democratically
elected “chief” by the boys, calls a congress by blowing it and
in meetings, the person holding the conch is the only one allowed to
talk. When Jack and his minions speak out of turn or ignore protocol,
links to civilization are undermined and when the conch is finally
destroyed, so is the last link to Western humanism severed.
Of
course the most important symbol on the island is that of the Beast,
whose existence is rumored first among the littluns, affirmed by
SamnEric, and whose mysterious representation of evil is availed by
Jack for his belligerent ends. Essentially the Beast is to the
children what the Devil was to medieval Europe, Communism was to
1950s Americans, and how Islamic fundamentalism serves as a Boogyman
for contemporary nervousness-- a threat exaggerated by a power
structure needed to justify its more extreme actions. Golding's
point, of course, is that the Beast is within, and sets out to
dramatize it by making his actors civilized British schoolchildren.
Youth is usually conflated with innocence, but on this metaphorical
island only a very few are good, a few are innately evil, and the
majority morally malleable, unable to think intelligently for
themselves, following the will of power rather than reason when given
both alternatives: “There was the brilliant world of hunting,
tactics, fierce exhilaration, skill; and there was the world of
longing and baffled common-sense.” As an inkblot, Golding sees a
monstrous id colored in blood staining on our collective tabula raza.
Youthful innocence is a canard if the Beast is always there, a
potential manifestation from within. For a twelve-year-old reading
Lord of the Flies for
the first time, this is a rotten apple to consume from the Tree of
Knowledge, difficult to digest, but an integral view on human nature
we do well to learn and understand.
No comments:
Post a Comment