“Everything everybody
does is so-- I don't know-- not wrong,
or even mean, or even stupid necessarily. But just so tiny and
meaningless and sad-making. And the worst part is, if you go bohemian
or something crazy like that, you're conforming just as much as
everybody else, only in a different way.”
Nowhere near as beloved as J.D.
Salinger's most famous novel, Franny and Zooey
is nevertheless a fine follow-up to Catcher in the Rye,
once you've finished university,
talked a good game, enjoyed a few wild streaks, got a good job, and
have come to the realization that for all your good fortune, your
education, your friendships, and your loves loved and lost, there is
yet something amiss, intangibly off, and the anxiety that this might
be all there is. Luckily, I have never suffered the nervous breakdown
that strikes the titular Franny, who for all her beauty and
intelligence has an acute Holdenesque disconnect from the physical
world, leading her to chant “Lord Jesus Christ, have mercy on me,”
a mantra she's learned from a story about a Russian peasant seeking
God called Way of the Pilgrim,
a book handed down from her older brother, Seymour, the famous
suicide in Salinger's short story, “A Perfect Day for Banana Fish.”
Franny's
existential dilemma is the thread between the two stories (originally
published within a few years of each other in The New
Yorker in the 1950s), the short
“Franny” and the novella-length “Zooey.” The former concerns Franny's disastrous date with her long-distance beau, Lane,
on the eve of the big football game with Yale, the latter story with her
brother Zooey's attempt to prod Franny out of her misery. Both
pieces are dialogue-rich and easy to imagine as theatrical
productions, especially as both Franny and Zooey are actors and have
an air of the performer, charisma, and a genius for wit (the reader
senses the impact such a family drama, especially one so connected to
disillusionment of the adult world, would have on contemporary
artists, most especially the filmmaker Wes Anderson). As much of a
legend Holden Caulfield is, Salinger seemed much more interested in
the Glass family, its vaudeville parents and seven children, all of
whom were once regarded as child prodigies on a radio program called
It's a Wise Child.
Lane,
over martinis and snails at a lunch date in an upscale bistro, just
wants to talk about some “goddamn” paper he wrote about Flaubert.
Franny, chain-smoking and not even looking at her chicken sandwich,
recognizes in Lane the supercilious mannerisms emblematic of the
culture she is from and which she has begun to despise. It leads to
several remarkable outbursts, flabbergasting Lane: “I'm just
sick of ego, ego, ego. My own and everybody else's. I'm sick of
everybody that wants to get somewhere,
do something distinguished and all, be somebody interesting.”
Living on nerves and Marlboros, Franny faints in the ladies' room.
In the follow-up
novella, Franny is back at the family loft in Manhattan's Upper East
Side, refusing to eat Bessie Glass' chicken soup, smoking cigarettes
on the sofa, and mumbling sotto voce the Pilgrim's chant.
Zooey, her older brother (the two are the youngest members of the
Glass family), is a successful TV actor who knows nevertheless that
television is a waste of time (and arguably his talent). Like Franny,
he has an overactive bullshit detector and some keen legacy childhood
interest in spirituality, courtesy of Seymour and Buddy (the oldest
of the Glass children), who had evangelized ideas about Buddha,
karma, dharma, and the like to Zooey and Franny when most kids their age were
engaged in hide and seek. “We're freaks,” Zooey reminds Franny.
He too had had his ordeal when the Jesus prayer had overwhelmed his
sense of being and he'd considered abandoning his worldly possessions
to live as a wandering mendicant. Even at 25 when you're old enough
to know how the game is played and play it well, Zooey can't help
calling bullshit on his peers, his friends, and even his mentors: “I
make everybody feel that he doesn't really want to do any good work
but that he just wants to get work done that will be thought good by
everyone he knows-- the critics, the sponsors, the public, even his
children's schoolteacher. That's what I do. That's the worst I do.”
J.D. Salinger
Elegantly
written, a tad whimsical, and bolstered by strong personalities,
Franny and Zooey is
not so much about questing for the meaning of life, but a means for
getting by spiritually in a secular, consumeristic society. It is
well-documented that Salinger himself was exploring oriental
philosophies, likely in order to better cope with the horrors he
witnessed in Europe during the Second World War. And no doubt it
wouldn't have taken very long for someone as sensitive as Salinger to
weary of the fame he'd become associated with in Holden. (I wonder if
he had a stock answer for when daft strangers queried whether Catcher
was autobiographical...) In all
likelihood, Salinger had been socially paralyzed by fame and its
inevitable protocol, dramatizing an explanation for his own
withdrawal from the world. It's possible to conjecture as well that
the tepid response to his publications following Catcher
caused him to resent the reading public for expecting multiple
masterpieces. Or maybe he just didn't really love people. The same
loathing of “phonies” found in Catcher
is obviously here in Franny and Zooey,
only more measured and restrained. No one thinks of Salinger as a
people's person, but we don't want to think of him as a misanthrope
either; 'troubled genius' is a nifty fit. It will do well to remember
that no one is perfect and no one is more aware of that than the sort
of mind that might conjure the Glass family and Holden too. Salinger,
via Zooey Glass, reminds us (lest we forget): “An artist's
only concern is to shoot for some kind of perfection, and on his
own terms, not anyone else's.”
In the end, it's good enough to help Franny get through her funk and
sage comfort for the rest of us when, inevitably, into a void, we ask
ourselves what are we doing all this for...?
No comments:
Post a Comment